A good part of the world regards
Pakistan a terrorist state. The rationale for this is that the
Pakistani ISI supports the Taliban and various other terrorist
organizations who perpetrate terrorism in Pakistan and
in neighbouring countries like India and Afghanistan.
Apart from this they have links with and have harboured other global jihadis. So, they are
a terrorist state. Now, one of the ideas of M.K. Gandhi that I agree
with is that hunger is the worst form of violence. So, wouldn't supporting corruption that leads to hunger and starvation qualify as terrorism too?
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Sunday, October 7, 2012
Indian Independence: Was non-violence worth it?
Posted by
FobyCoconut
at
4:47 PM
A
look back at whether India's non-violent freedom struggle was
effective for ordinary Indians.
In
retrospect was India's non-violent freedom struggle good or bad? Many
decades have passed since India won it's independence from Britain.
Since then the Indian independence movement has been an inspiration
for some non-violent freedom and civil rights movements around the
world. Politicians in India have milked the associated imagery to
define vote banks. Foreign dignitaries who visit India praise Gandhi
and India visit Gandhi's Samadhi, or memorial, in
Delhi. But, has it been good for India in the long run? It's time to
take a look at this story from a layman's point of view instead of a
historian's or a self serving politician's point of view.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)